Mengungkap Kriteria Hadis Palsu dalam Ilmu Mustalahul Hadis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunaedu.v4i2.1154Keywords:
Hadith Maudu, Hadith, Sanad, MatanAbstract
Scholars differ on when the forgery of hadith began. People have falsified various hadiths for varying motives and purposes. Furthermore, for certain interests, people are able and willing to fabricate them. The term “hadith maudu’” is defined as a hadith attributed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) that is fabricated and false, even though he did not actually say, do, or establish it. Using a “maudu’” hadith is invalid, and it is forbidden to narrate it unless forced to do so or to have the hadith examined by a scholar. Based on existing historical data, hadith forgery was not only carried out by Muslims but also by non-Muslims, for various motives and interests, including political conflict, the efforts of heretics (zindiq), fanaticism towards nations and tribes, and efforts to influence the laity, among others.
Keywords: Hadith; Hadith Maudu’; Sanad; Matan
References
Abu Ghuddah, Abdul Fatah. Lamhat min Tārīkh As-Sunnah wa ‘Ulūm al-Hadits. T.t.: T.p., t.t.
Aini, Siti Qomariyah. “Kritik Matan Hadis Perspektif Mahmud Abu Rayyah.” Alhamra: Jurnal Studi Islam 2, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v2i2.11815.
Akbar, N., dan M. Ali. “Hadis Sahih, Hasan, Daif dan Maudu’.” Mahad Aly Journal of Islamic Studies (2025). https://doi.org/10.63398/befn1d95.
Ash-Shiddieqy, M. Hasbi. Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadits. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1987.
Ath-Thahan, Mahmud. Taisir Musthalah al-Hadits. Beirut: Dar al-Qur’an al-Karim, 1981.
Abu Rayyah, Mahmud. Adhwā’ ‘Alā al-Sunnah al-Muhammadiyah. Mekah: Dar al-Ma’arif, t.t.
Al-Khatib, Ajjaj. Ushul al-Hadits: ‘Ulumuhu wa Musthalahuhu. Cet. ke-4. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1981.
Al-Maliki, Sayid Muhammad bin Alwi. Kaidah-Kaidah Dasar Ilmu Hadits. Surabaya: Apollo, t.t.
As-Salih, Subhi. ‘Ulum al-Hadits wa Musthalahuh. Beirut: Dar al-‘Ilm al-Malayin, 1997.
“Analisis Kriteria Kesahihan Matan dalam Hadis: Kajian Teori dan Metodologi.” Journal of Hadith Studies 6, no. 2 (2023): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v6i2-02.
Hendro, B. “Kritik Sanad dan Matan Hadis dalam Shahih Muslim yang Dianggap Lemah Nashiruddin al-Albani.” Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara 3, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24235/jshn.v3i2.9699.
Ismail, Suhdi. Kaidah Keshahihan Hadis: Telaah Kritis dan Tinjauan dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1988.
Juynboll, G.H.A. Kontroversi Hadis di Mesir (1890–1960). Bandung: Mizan, 1999.
Malik, H. A. “Naqd al-Hadits sebagai Metode Kritik Kredibilitas Informasi Islam.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 1, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21580/jish.11.1373.
Muvid, M. B., B. T. Arsyillah, dan Muammar. “Ilmu Jarh wa al-Ta’dil dalam Tinjauan Studi Hadits.” Universum: Jurnal Keislaman dan Kebudayaan 16, no. 1 (2022): 34–55. https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v16i1.12.
Muzakki, M. A. “Analisa Metodologi Kritik Hadis Jalaluddin as-Suyuthi dalam al-La’aali al-Mashnu’ah fi al-Ahadits al-Maudhu’ah.” AL ISNAD: Journal of Indonesian Hadith Studies (2020).
Suparta, Munzier. Ilmu Hadis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2001.
Suyuthi, Jalal Al-Din Abd. Rahman bin Abi Bakar. Al-La’ali al-Mashnū’ah fī al-Ahādīts al-Maudhū’āt. Juz II. Mesir: Al-Maktabah al-Islamiyah, t.t.
Zahri, Musthafa. Kunci Memahami Musthalahul Hadis. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1995.
Zaman, M. B. “Kritik Hadis Prespektif Akram Diya’ al-Umari.” Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 8, no. 2 (2018): 317–345. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2018.8.2.317-345.
Zamawi, B. Z. “Kritik Hadis Zakaria Ouzon.” Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya 2, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v2i1.221.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nasiri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
