Scrutinizing Integrative Learning in Arabic Instruction

Authors

  • Pradi Khusufi Syamsu Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0071-6386
  • Achmad Satori Ismail Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sukron Kamil Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhbib Abdul Wahab Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v2i1.78

Keywords:

Integrative Learning, Arabic Learning, CBI, CLIL, Naẓariyyah al-wiḥdah

Abstract

This research aims to find new ideas in integrative Arabic learning. The research conducted in this article is qualitative. Extracting research sources takes one form, sources of bibliographical data in the form of authoritative books and journal articles related to integrative Arabic learning. In terms of approach, this study uses a qualitative approach and a philosophical approach. The qualitative approach is related to the quality, value, or meaning that is explained through language or words. While the philosophical approach to explaining the scientific basis and nature or wisdom of a formal object. This study confirms that integrative Arabic learning is learning Arabic that combines the four language skills (listening, speaking, reading, and writing), elements of Arabic, language competence (competence linguistics, communicative competence, and cultural competence) and integrates all aspects of learning both academic and non-academic so that all Arabic learning programs are designed and implemented in an integrated and programmed manner in every student's daily life. Integrative Arabic learning is precisely in accordance with the character of the language itself which is an inseparable unit where the breadth of language must be treated as a whole and not narrowly. Several scholars who support the above opinion include Ibn Khaldun, Tamam Hassan, Ahmad Abduh Iwadh, Muhbib Abdul Wahab, Munther Younes, Farid Khalfawi, and Balqasim Malikiyah. The conclusion of this study is different from Noam Chomsky's opinion who concluded that language ability is a natural talent, not determined by the natural environment because language is not a habit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Zaenul Fitri, L. I. (2020). Model Pendekatan Multi-Inter-Transdisipliner dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Kurikulum KKNI. Tulungagung: Akademia Pustaka.

Ahmad, L. T. (2019). al-Qaḍāyā al-Balāgiyyah wa al-Adabiyyah wa al-Lugawiyyah ‘ind Ibnu Qutaibah. Kairo: Maktabah al-Ādāb.

al-Fauzān, ‘. a.-R. (1435). al-‘Arabiyyah bain Yadaika: Kitāb aṭ- Ṭālib al-Awwal (Vols. 1-2). Riyadh: Maktabah al-Malik Fahd al-Wathaniyyah.

al-Ghulāyaini, M. b. (2019). Jami’ ad-Durus al-‘Arabiyyah: Masu’ah fi Tsalah Ajza. Jakarta: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

Alioui, B. (n.d.). At-Takāmul al-Ma’rifī bain ‘Ulūm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah wa ‘Ulūm asy-Syarī’ah al-Islāmiyyah. Al-Turath Journal, 11(2), 32.

al-Jurjani, A. Q. (1375). Kitāb Dalāil al-I’jāz. Kairo: Maktabah al-Khanji.

al-Jurjānī, A. Q. (2009). Durj ad-Durar fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Aẓīm (Vol. 1). Oman: Dar al-Fikr.

al-Khawārizmī, M. b.-Z. (2009). Tafsīr al-Kasysyāf. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah.

al-Khawārizmī, M. b.-Z. (2009). Tafsīr al-Kasysyāf. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah.

Anbarī, M. b. (1998). 'Ulūm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah wa Ṣillatuhā bi ‘Ulūm asy-Syarī’ah al-Islāmiyyah. Al-Ihya, 1(1), 211-212.

an-Nāqah, M. K. (1985). Ta’līm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah li an-Nāṭiqīn bi Lugah Ukhrā. Mekkah: Jami’ah Ummul Qurra.

as-Sakaki, A. Y. (1987). Miftāh al-‘Ulūm. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

as-Saman, M. ‘. (1983). At-Taujīh fī Tadrīs al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah. Kairo: Dār al-Ma‘arif.

aż-Żahabi, M. Ḥ. (2000). At-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn (Vol. 1). Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah.

Banegas, D. L. (2012). Integrating Content and language in English Language Teaching in Secondary Education: Models, Benefits, and Challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111.

Batmang. (2016, Juli-Desember). Pendekatan Transdisipliner (Suatu Alternatif Pemecahan Masalah Pendidikan). Jurnal Al-Ta’dib, 9(2), 47.

Butler, Y. G. (2005). Content-Base Instruction in EFL Contexts: Consideration for Effective Implementation. JALT Journal,, 27(2), 229.

Emzir. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. (Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Fahrurrozi, A. (2014). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab: Problematika dan Solusinya. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 1(2), 165-174.

Farīd Khalfāwī, B. M. (2016, Juli). Aṭ-Ṭarīqah at-Takāmuliyyah fī Ta’līm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah. Majallah ‘Ulum al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah wa Adabuha, 9.

Forgarty, R. (1991). The Mindful School: How to Integrate the Curricula. Palatine: Skylight Publishing Inc.

Gunawan, I. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Ḥassan, T. (1973). Al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah Ma’nāhā wa Mabnāhā. Kairo : al-Haiah al-Mishriyyah al-‘Ammah li al-Kitab.

Hermawan, A. (2011). Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Howard Brown, A. B. (2016). EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing Approaches and Goals. Jappan Assosoationon For Language Teaching (JALT) , 329.

Husaini, A. (2013). Filsafat Ilmu Perspektif Barat dan Islam. Jakarta: : Gema Insani Press.

Ibrāhīm, A. a.-‘. (1968). Al-Muwajjih al-Fannī li Mudarris al-‘Arabiyyah. Makkah: Dar al-Ma‘arif.

Isytih, H. H. (2014, Maret). al-Manāhij an-Nahwiyyah wa al-Balāgiyyah bain al-Istiqlāliyyah wa at-Takāmuliyyah. ad-Dirasat al-Islamiyyah, 49(1), 161.

Iwaḍ, A. ‘. (2000). Madākhil Ta’līm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah: Dirāsah Masḥiyyah Naqdiyyah. Mekkah: ami’ah Ummul Qurra,.

Kamil, S. (2013). Najib Mahfuz: Sastra, Islam dan Politik Studi Semiotik terhadap Novel Aulad Haratina. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Kamil, S. (2019). Ensiklopedi Bahasa dan Sastra Arab. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Khaldūn, ‘. b. (2011). Mukaddimah Ibnu Khaldun. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Krulatz, A. (2019). Content Based Instruction in Teacher Education: Reshaping Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs About Language Teaching. ELTED, 22, 9.

Kysilka, M. L. (1998). Understanding Integrated Curriculum. The Curriculum Journal,, 9(2), 199-200.

Mabrurrosi, A. M. (2022, March). Reflections on Ibn Jinni's Thought : Analysis of words and meanings in Arabic Semantics. Al-Irfan: Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies, 5(1), 1.

Mālikiyah, F. K. (n.d.). Aṭ-Ṭarīqah at-Takāmuliyyah fī Ta’līm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah. Majallah ‘Ulum al-Lughah wa Adabuha, 8(9).

Mas’ud, F. ( 2005). Rawai’ min Asy’ar aṣ-Ṣahabah. Kairo: Dar al-Hadis.

Masqon, D. (2014, April). Nahwa Mustaqbal Afḍal Ta’ammulāt fī Taf’īl ‘Amaliyyah Ta’līm al-Lugah al-‘Arabiyyah li Abnā’ Indūnisiyyā. Lisanu ad-Dhad, 1(1), 5-6.

Matthew B. Miles, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: a Methods Sourcebook. London: Sage Publications.

Mawardi, I. (2013). Pendidikan Islam Transdisipliner dan Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 28(2), 255.

Mockler, N. (2018). Curriculum Integration in the 21st Century: Some Reflections in the Light of the Australian Curriculum. Springer Nature in Curriculum Perspectives, 2-3.

Nasution, K. (2017, Juni). Berpikir Rasional-Ilmiah dan Pendekatan Interdisipliner dan Multidisipliner dalam Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam. Al-Ahwal, 10(1), 19-20.

Nata, A. ( 1999). Metodologi Studi Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Rosalinda. (2020). Sastra Agama dan Kuasa Sosial: Analisis Wacana Kritis atas Nahj al-Burdah Karya ‘Abd al-Hamid bin Ahmad al-Khatib al-Minangkabawi. Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing.

Rosyada, D. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sarip, M. (2019, Juni). Model of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Strategy in Arabic Speaking Subject. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 6(1).

Sudikan, S. Y. (2015, Maret). Pendekatan Interdisipliner, Multidisipliner, dan Transdisipliner dalam Studi Sastra. Paramasastra: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Sastra dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1).

Sunhaji. (2014, Juli). Model Pembelajaran Integratif Pendidikan Agama Islam dengan Sains”, . Jurnal Insania, 19(2), 341-342.

Susan M. Drake, R. C. (2004). Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum. Virginia: ASCD.

Susan M. Drake, R. C. (2004). Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum. Viginia: ASCD.

Vera Pakharukova, O. T. (2019). Methodology of Integrated language Learning Projects for University Undergraduates. Revista Espacios, 40(5), 1.

Wahab, M. A. (2016). Standardisasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Bahasa Arab di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 3(1).

Yoke Suryadarma, I. F. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Peserta Program Pemantapan Bahasa Arab dan Shahsiah (KEMBARA) Ke 4 Pelajar Kolej Universiti Islam Antar Bangsa Selangor (KUIS) Tahun 2018. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab V, (p. 360). Malang.

Younes, M. (2015). The Integrated Approach to Arabic Instruction. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

Syamsu, P. K., Ismail, A. S., Kamil, S., & Wahab, M. A. (2023). Scrutinizing Integrative Learning in Arabic Instruction. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities, 2(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v2i1.78