Scientific Theology: Shift From Epistemological Transformation To Integrative Axiological Transformation

Authors

  • Eva Dewi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
  • Nelvawita Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
  • Sariah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
  • Rina Rehayati Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
  • Suhertina Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
  • Mochammad Novendri S Institut Agama Islam Imam Syafii Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v5i1.912

Keywords:

Scientific, Theology, Epistemology, Axiology, Interdisciplinary

Abstract

positivist or materialistic paradigm assumes that if the progress of science and technology can meet human needs, then society becomes independent of religion in its life. This view is, on one hand, accurate when science and technology are only considered in their material aspects. However, when understood in their immaterial aspects, it can raise issues. In Indonesia, the development of science has faced various challenges, including a shift in the nature of scientific research from being proportional (objective analysis) to becoming intentional within bureaucracy and elitism, which can hinder the performance of scientific exploration. Additionally, there is the issue of the sacralization of science, radicalism, the quest for singular truth, and the dichotomy of knowledge. To address the above-mentioned issues, the researcher employs Pierre Felix Bourdieu's Structuralism-Constructivism theory in this study, which acknowledges the role of both subject and object in the development of knowledge. The objective of this research is to explore how the concept of scientific theology shifts from epistemological transformation to integrative axiological transformation as one of the constructive solutions in the development of scholarship in Indonesia. As for the research method, this study utilizes the library research method (literature review) with a qualitative and descriptive analysis approach.The research findings explain that scholarship must be developed with the paradigm of Scientific Theology by transforming normative thinking traditions into applied theoretical thinking traditions, shifting from a tradition of material mastery to methodological mastery, and changing ideological thinking traditions into rational thinking in achieving the integration of religion and science without sacrificing the autonomy of different disciplines in all aspects of life.

   

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Abdullah. (2022). Integrasi Agama dan Sains dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pilar: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer, 1(13), 120–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26618/r31xkx35

Ali, N. (2019). Integrative Curriculum of Religion and Science at a Special Pesantren for University Students. ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam, 20(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v20i1.6353

Amin Abdullah, M. (2014). Religion, science and culture: An integrated, interconnected paradigm of science. Al-Jami’ah, 52(1), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2014.521.175-203

Aminullah Poya, H. R. (2023). Al-Ghazali’s Theory of Real Knowledge: An Exploration of Knowledge Integration in Islamic Epistemology through Contemporary Perspectives 1,2). International Journal of Humanities Education And Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(2), 607–624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.627

Andika, A. (2022). Agama Dan Perkembangan Teknologi. Abrahamic Religions: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 2(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.22373/arj.v2i1.12556

Anggraini, R., & Anugrah, D. W. (2025). Pierre Bourdieu’s Habitus Analysis Of The“ Good Practice" Learning Model at SD. 9(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/skijier.2025.91.03

AR, M. (2016). Sains, Teknologi, Dan Nilai-Nilai Moral. Elkawnie, 2(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.22373/ekw.v2i2.2657

Badarussyamsi, B. (2015). Spiritualitas Sains Dalam Islam: Mengungkap Teologi Saintifik Islam. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 39(2), 255–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v39i2.17

Berry, W. (2000). Life Is a Miracle. Counterpoint.

Cragun, R. T. (2015). Science and Religion. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences: Second Edition, February, 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.84049-0

Dasopang, M. D., Adam, H. J. S. B. H. J., & Nasution, I. F. A. (2022). Integration of Religion and Culture in Muslim Minority Communities Through Islamic Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v8i2.19445

Evers, D., & Evers, D. (2023). St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology and Science (Issue August).

Fakhri, J. (2010). Sains Dan Teknologi Dalam Al Qur’an Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. Ta’dib, 15(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v15i01.70

Fasco, P. S., Asiimwe, S., Tushabe, J., & Ssekabira, G. (2024). Epistemology unveiled : Exploring the foundations of knowledge in philosophy. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews (WJARR), 1(23), 2745–2755. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.1.2285

Jatmiko, M. I. (2025). Maintaining Al-Ma’un’s Spirit Amid The Neoliberalization Of Education: A Bourdiesusian Analysis Of The Muhammadiyah Modern Islamic School in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Ilmu Sosial, 24, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.24.1.2025.29-52

L.J. Moleong. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Lambert, D., & Oleksowicz, M. (2025). The Quest for Intelligibility as Mediation Between Science and Theology. Religions, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16040421

Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (n.d.). 21 Century Skills: Prepare Students For The Future (Kappa Delta Pi Record, 121AD).

Lubis, A. Y. (2014). Postmodernisme: Teori dan Praktek (1st ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada.

M. Amin Abdullah. (2020). Multidisiplin, Interdisiplin, & Transdisiplin: Metode Studi Agama & Studi Islam di Era Kontemporer (1st ed.). IB Pustaka PT Litera Cahaya Bangsa.

Machasin. (2012). Islam Dinamis Islam Harmonis, Lokalitas Pluralisme Terorisme. LKiS.

Masykur, Z. M., Niam, S., Naim, N., Islam, U., Sayyid, N., & Rahmatullah, A. (2023). Scientia Sacra: Seyyed Hossein Nasr Perspektif Filsafat Lingkungan Dan Kontribusinya Pada pengembangan Kajian Ekologis. Sunbstantia: Ilmu-Ilmu Islam, 25(2), 166–183. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/substantia

Mujamil Qomar. (2011). Merintis Kejayaan Islam Kedua, Merombak Pemikiran, dan Mengembangkan Aksi. Teras.

Rizal Mustansyir dan Misnal Munir. (2006). Filsafat Ilmu. Pustaka Pelajar.

Romdlony, M. Z., Darmawan, D., & Anwar, R. (2025). Tawḥīdī Epistemology : Uniting Rationality , Empiricism , and Transcendence within the Framework of Islamic Science. 13(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v13i2.47380

Saad, M. (2016). Pemikiran Mehdi Golshani Tentang Dialektika Agama dan Sains. Teosofl: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 6(2), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2016.6.2.330-354

Sarbaini, A. (2022). Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama sebagai Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Riayah: Jurnal Sosial Dan Kegamaan, 1(7), 85. https://doi.org/10.32332/riayah.v7i01.5067

Săvoiu, G., & Simăn, I. I. (2020). Science and Religion In The Contemporary Reality: Dialogue, Convergence and Multidisciplinary Results.

Sirajuddin Zar. (2012). Filsafat Islam Filosof dan Filsafatnya. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soleh, K. (2013). Filsafat islam dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Arruzz Media.

Syafi’e, I. (2000). Konsep Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Al-Qur’an, Telaah Dan Pendekatan Filsafat Ilmu. UII Press.

Yudi Latif. (2015). Revolusi Pancasila. Mizan.

Zainul Kamal. (2006). Ibn Taimiyah Versus Para Fiosof. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-07

How to Cite

Dewi, E., Nelvawita, N., Sariah, S., Rehayati, R., Suhertina, S., & Novendri S, M. (2026). Scientific Theology: Shift From Epistemological Transformation To Integrative Axiological Transformation. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities, 5(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v5i1.912