Kebijakan Hukum Penguatan Kewenangan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Berbasis Prinsip Al-‘Adl dan Al-Maslahah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v1i02.1168Keywords:
Sharia arbitration, legal policy, al-‘adl, al-maslahah, dispute settlementAbstract
The increasingly complex development of sharia economic and business transactions has given rise to diverse forms of contemporary disputes that demand settlement mechanisms that are fast, fair, legally certain, and in accordance with sharia principles. National sharia arbitration holds a strategic position as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism outside the courts, yet the effectiveness of its authority still faces normative, institutional, and harmonization problems with the national judicial system. This study aims to analyze the construction of legal policy for strengthening the authority of national sharia arbitration and to formulate a development model based on the principles of al-‘adl and al-maslahah in resolving contemporary disputes. The study uses a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are analyzed in a qualitative-prescriptive manner by integrating legal policy theory, sharia arbitration, and the principles of justice and maslahah in Islamic law. The results show that strengthening sharia arbitration requires reconstructing legal policy through clarifying competence and the scope of authority, harmonizing regulations, strengthening the finality and enforceability of decisions, enhancing the independence and professionalism of arbitrators, and integrating sharia principles into the dispute resolution process. The principle of al-‘adl places substantive justice, equality of the parties, and independence as the basis for dispute resolution, while al-maslahah orients decisions toward benefit, protection of rights, and prevention of harm. The novelty of this study lies in its formulation of a legal policy model for strengthening sharia arbitration that integrates national legal certainty with the values of sharia justice and maslahah. This model is expected to form sharia arbitration that is more adaptive, effective, and responsive to the development of contemporary disputes.
References
Achmad Fikri Oslami. “KEDUDUKAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN BASYARNAS DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH.” AT-TASYRI’: JURNAL ILMIAH PRODI MUAMALAH, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47498/tasyri.v14i1.860.
Ahmad Saprudin. “Quo Vadis Basyarnas Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan Syariah.” Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama, 2024.
Alaqoh, Shofwatul, and Abdul Mujib. “Penerapan Asas Sederhana, Cepat, Biaya Ringan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pegadaian Syariah Melalui Basyarnas (Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional).” Pagaruyuang Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v0i0.4065.
Alifya, Natasya, Tria Enjelika Br Tobing, and Muna Safitri. “Peran Lembaga Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis the Role of Arbitration Institutions in Business Dispute Resolution.” JArbI: Jurnal Arbitrase Indonesia 1 (2025).
Andaryuni, Lilik. “EKSISTENSI BASYARNAS PASCA LAHIRNYA UU NO. 3 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA.” At-Tawazun, Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 9, no. 01 (2021). https://doi.org/10.55799/tawazun.v9i01.93.
Apriyandanu, Ephin. “Kedudukan Basyarnas Dalam Penanganan Kepailitan Perbankan Syariah Ditinjau Dari UU No. 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 1, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i1.2230.
Apriyanti, Iksan, and Kasmar. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI LUAR PERADILAN.” Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6 (2025).
Batubara, Rizki Agung Ramadhan. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Secara Arbitrase Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas).” Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara 2 (2020).
Dinda Fasyya, Mujnah Fitria, and Nadhifa Kharida Nissa. “Prosedur Berperkara: Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional.” Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry 1, no. 3 (2026). https://doi.org/10.65310/wrpvb054.
Elvia, Evi Eka, Abdul Mujib, Azhar Nor, and Muhammad Imanuddin Akbar. “BASYARNAS AS A PLACE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF MUSYARAKAH FINANCING IN SHARIA BANKING IN THE DISRUPTION ERA.” El-Mashlahah 13, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v13i1.5345.
Faizal, Bhismoadi Tri Wahyu. “MENAKAR URGENSI PENGATURAN PELAKSANAAN DAN PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN ARBITRASE SYARIAH NASIONAL (BASYARNAS).” Ijlil 1, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.35719/ijl.v1i01.73.
Faizatul Fitriyah. “Tantangan Arbiter Syariah Di Basyarnas Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perbankan Syariah.” Kariman: Jurnal Pendidikan Keislaman 9, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.52185/kariman.v9i1.167.
Idandi limbong, Irfan Maulana Siregar, Chairul Azmi Nasution, Raja Muhammad Fahreza, Muhammad Fadil, and Nurul Kholis. “Arbitrase Syariah Di Indonesia : Tantangan Dan Solusi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v1i4.135.
Iqbal. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN SYARIAH SECARA NON LITIGASI DI BADAN ARBITRASE SYARIAH NASIONAL.” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, no. 8.5.2017 (2022).
Irawan, Anggi, and Syafira. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui BASYARNAS : Efektivitas Dan Tantangannya.” The Renewal of Islamic Economic Law 6, no. 1 (2025).
Isman, Dedi, M. Dawud Arif Khan, and Abdul Wahab Abd. Muhaimin. “PERBEDAAN PEMBIAYAAN PEMILIKAN RUMAH SYARIAH TANPA BANK DAN PEMBIAYAAN PEMILIKAN RUMAH DENGAN BANK SYARIAH DITINJAU DARI HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH DAN HUKUM POSITIF.” MISYKAT Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Quran Hadist Syari Ah Dan Tarbiyah 10, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.33511/misykat.v10n1.83-99.
Isnaini, Atin Meriati. “Batas Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Syariah Antara Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional ( Basyarnas ) Dengan Pengadilan Agama.” Unizar Law Review (ULR) 3, no. Vol 3 No 2 (2020): Unizar Law Review (2020).
Jumriani, Andi Esse, Endahizki Ekwanto, and Agustina W. M Gubali. “Penyelesaiaan Sengketa Tanah Wakaf Melalui Pengadilan Agama.” Law & Social Justice Journal 3, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.61121/9667nw44.
KUSUMA, M W, A Gofar, and M Utama. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional.” Repository.Unsri.Ac.Id, 2008.
Minardi, A. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Dua Jalur Antara Pengadilan Agama Dan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS).” Jurnal Agama Indonesia Dan Masyarakat 1 (2020).
Musaddad, Ahmad. “Peran Dan Problematika Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Di Indonesia.” Annual Conference On Islamic Economic And Law, no. November (2024).
Nur, Mohamad. “Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Akad Murabahah (Jual-Beli) Antara Bank Syariah X Dengan PT AS Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (BASYARNAS-MUI).” Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal 6, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.6.2.149-158.2020.
Permata, Cahaya, Mhd. Yadi Harahap, Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar, and Iwan Iwan. “Optimizing the Legal Status of the National Sharia Arbitration Board as a Non-Litigation Institution for Sharia Economics in Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama 16, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.58836/jpma.v16i2.28104.
Rachman, Abdul, Sri Tamara Devi, and Widi Astuti. “PERAN BADAN ARBITRASE SYARIAH NASIONAL MAJELIS ULAMA INDONESIA (BASYARNAS-MUI) DALAM MENGATASI SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI INDONESIA.” Madani Syari’ah 5, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.51476/madanisyariah.v5i2.385.
Rahma, Tri Inda Fhadila. Perbankan Syariah I. Buku Diktat, 2019.
Ramadhoni, Ahmad Rizqi. “Bank Syariah; Prospek Dalam Mengembangkan Aktivitas Ekonomi.” Digital Business: Tren Bisnis Masa Depan 15, no. 4 (2024).
Rizki Faza Rinanda, Wati Rahmi Ria, Yulia KW. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS).” Pactum Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2018).
Sakti, Lanang, and Nadhira Wahyu Adityarani. “Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 2021. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v2i1.1059.
Sofiani, Triana. “DUALISME PENYELESIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH (Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012).” JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM, 2015. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v13i2.491.
Sufriadi, Sufriadi. “Memberdayakan Peran Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Luar Pengadilan.” La_Riba 1, no. 2 (2007). https://doi.org/10.20885/lariba.vol1.iss2.art6.
Sutiyadi, Sutiyadi, and Andi Saputera. “Peran Basyarnas Dalam Penyelesain Sengketa Syariah.” Journal of Legal Sustainability 1, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.69693/jols.v1i3.104.
Uzma, Ummi. “PELAKSANAAN ATAU EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN BADAN ARBITRASE SYARIAH NASIONAL (BASYARNAS) SEBAGAI KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 44, no. 3 (2014). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol44.no3.28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Arminsyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
