Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan terhadap Hewan Perspektif Fikih Jinayah

Authors

  • Zannuba Qamariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Halimatusyadiah Halimatusyadiah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Dwi Us Natun Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Sabarudin Ahmad Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v1i01.84

Keywords:

Animal Persecution, Criminal Law, Jinayah Jurisprudence

Abstract

Animals are often humans' pets, which are useful for playing, making friends, or acting as guardians. but some people actually use animals, exploit, abuse, and even kill them for certain interests. Currently, the problem of mistreatment of animals is increasingly apprehensive. Through information in various media, cases of mistreatment of animals can be identified. Islam as the majority religion in Indonesia teaches to be a mercy to the universe, including taking care of animals on earth. However, Indonesia is the country with the largest number of downloaders of animal abuse content in the world. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze these problems in the perspective of jurisprudence. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and analysis of Islamic legal theories. The results of this study indicate that the crime of mistreatment of animals in Indonesia is regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 302 and Article 540, as well as Law Number 18 of 2009 as amended by Law Number 41 of 2014 concerning Animal Husbandry and Health. Animal abuse in jinayah fiqh is included in the jarimah ta'zir, in which the level and punishment is determined by the government (ulil amri).

References

Ahmad, Sabarudin. “Hukum Aborsi Akibat Perkosaan (Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 61 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kesehatan Reproduksi.” El-Mashlahah 8, no. 2 (2018): 162–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mas.v8i2.1321.

BIP, Tim. 3 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum, KUHPer, KUHP, KUHAP. Jakarta: Grahamedia Press, 2021.

Chandra, Widya Dika, and Pudji Astuti. “Penegakan Hukum Pasal 302 KUHP Tentang Penganiayaan Terhadap Hewan Di Surakarta.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 4 (2018): 1–8.

Daipon, Dahyul. “Komparatif Hukum Acara Pidana Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam (Jinayah) Aceh Dalam Proses Penyidikan.” El-Mashlahah 10, no. 1 (2020): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.23971/maslahah.v10i1.1780.

FNR. “Orangutan Tewas Di Karo, Tulang Punggung Retak Dianiaya.” CNN Indonesia, 2023.

Hasan, Mustofa, and Beni Ahmad Saebani. Hukum Pidana Islam Fiqh Jinayah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2013.

Helim, A, and S Ahmad. “Bapalas as Alternative Dispute Resolution of Fighting on Muslim Dayak Community in Muara Teweh, Central Kalimantan.” Samarah 6, no. 1 (2022): 331–45. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.12379.

Hidayat, Rahmat. “Analisis Penerapan Dan Penguatan Hukum Pada Bisnis Sapi Di Indonesia.” Living Law 2, no. 2015 (7AD): 140–49.

Huda, Larissa. “Indonesia Jadi Negara Paling Banyak Unduh Konten Penyiksaan Hewan, Pemprov DKI: Jerat Pidana Mengintai.” Kompas, 2022.

Irfan, M. Nurul, and Mayrofah. Fiqh Jinayah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Ivan, Epifanius. “Eksistensi Pasal 302 KUHP Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Hewan Di Indonesia,” 2013.

Mampow, Jonathan Toar. “Suatu Kajian Atas Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Terhadap Hewan Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Lex Administratum 5, no. 2 (2017): 149–57.

Mangunjaya, Fachruddin M. Pelestarian Satwa Langka Untuk Keseimbangan Ekosistem. Jakarta: Majelis Ulama Indonesia, 2017.

Mareta, Regita Wahyu. “Analisis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Hewan Dalam Tradisi Adu Bagong Di Jawa Barat Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam,” 2019.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2015.

Sudarti. “Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Perzinaan Di Malaysia Dan Brunei Darussalam.” El-Mashlahah 11, no. 1 (2021): 78–96. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i1.2643.

Sujono, Imam. “Urgensi Penemuan Hukum Dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi Dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 3 (February 15, 2022): 585. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1835.

Sujono, Imam, Yovita Arie Mangesti, and Slamet Suhartono. “THE SELLER’S LIABILITY DUE HIDDEN DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS IN THE ONLINE SELLING AND BUYING TRANSACTION BASE ON UUPK.” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 6, no. 2 (2022): 257–77.

Syamsuddin. “Antara Hukum Murtad Dalam Islam Dengan Kebebasan Beragama Dalam Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM).” El-Mashlahah 11, no. 1 (2021): 44–59. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i1.2623.

Wamad, Sudirman. “Jejak Aksi Kekerasan Oknum TNI Terhadap Satwa.” Detik, 2022.

Wardana, Anak Agung Ngurah Bayu Kresna, and I Gusti Ayu Agung Ari Krisnawati. “Penjatuhan Hukuman Untuk Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Hewan.” Kertha Wicara 5, no. 6 (2016): 1–5.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-27

How to Cite

Qamariah, Z., Halimatusyadiah, H., Natun, D. U., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan terhadap Hewan Perspektif Fikih Jinayah. TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah, 1(01), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v1i01.84