Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Mengadili Fiktif Positif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v4i2.1076Keywords:
Positive Fiction, Job Creation Law, State Administrative CourtAbstract
Positive fictitious arrangements were introduced through Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Administration. Furthermore, the positive fictitious regulation was changed through Article 175 number 6 of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation which was subsequently revoked by Perppu Number 2 of 2022. The Perppu was then ratified into Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law. This change creates ambiguity regarding the authority of the State Administrative Court in resolving positive fictitious applications. This study aims to analyze how positive fictitious regulations after the enactment of Article 175 Number 7 of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation. This research uses a normative legal research type with a statute approach, a comparative approach and a case approuch. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. These legal materials are analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results of this study are: 1) PTUN has the authority to attribute to try positive fictitious applications based on Article 53 of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning State Administration, which aims to provide legal protection, legal certainty, and realize the principle of administrative justice according to John Rawls, and 2) After going through changes in Article 175 Number 7 of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation, the authority of the PTUN was revoked, and the implementation of positive fictitious was transferred to a mechanism that had not been determined because the presidential regulation had not been issued, thus creating a legal vacuum.
References
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI.
Elviandri, "Quo Vadis Negara Kesejahteraan: Meneguhkan Ideologi Welfare State Negara Hukum Kesejahteraan Indonesia", Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 31.2 (2019), https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.32986.
HR, Ridwan. 2018. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Irvansyah, Andika Risqi, "Kedudukan Hukum Keputusan Fiktif Positif Sejak Pengundangan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja", JAPHTN-HAN, 1.2 (2022), https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i2.31.
Jamaluddin, Siti Rahmaniah dan Anna Erliyana, "Perbandingan Pengaturan Permohonan Fiktif Positif Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Dan Belanda", Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7.11 (2022), https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i11.
Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, "Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Cipta Kerja", 2020, 1–1982 <https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_cipta_kerja.pdf>.
Kurniawan, Fajri, et al, "Paradigma Undang – Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (KTUN) Bersifat Fiktif Positif", Puslitbang Hukum Dan Peradilan Ditjen Badan Per, 6.11 (2023), https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.612023.89-108.
Muchsin. 2003. Perlindungan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Investor Di Indonesia. Surakarta: Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Mujiburohman, Dian Aries. 2022. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
Nurwahyuni, et al, "Kedudukan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Modern", Jurnal Suara Hukum, 4.1 (2022), https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v4n1.
Pratama, Surya Mukti, "Pengaturan Baru Keputusan Fiktif Positif Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dan Kaitannya Dengan Kompetensi PTUN", Jurnal Rechtvinding, 2020
Pulungan, Rizky Andrian Ramadhan, "Mekanisme Pelaksanaan Prinsip Checks And Balances Antara Lembaga Legislatif Dan Eksekutif Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia", Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4.2 (2022), https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.280-293.
Setiono. 2003. Rule Of Law. Surakarta: Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Siagian, Abdhy, et al, "Optimalisasi Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad)", Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 6.1 (2023), https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.612023.35-58.
Simanjuntak, Enrico, "Perkara Fiktif Positif Dan Permasalahan Hukumnya", Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 6.3 (2017), https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.379-398.
Triyudiana, Andra, dan Putri Neneng, "Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Sebagai Fairness Menurut John Rawls Di Indonesia Sebagai Perwujudan Dari Pancasila", Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2.01 (2024).
Umar, Kusnadi, "Ambivalensi Penanganan Fiktif Positif Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020’, Jurnal Yudisial, 16.2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v16i2.555.
Zahro, Nur Eka Fatimatuz dan Ahmad Hasan Basri, "Konsep Permohonan Keputusan Fiktif Positif Pasca Berlakunya Pasal 175 Angka 7 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja", Journal of Law and Islamic Law, 1.1 (2023), 1–23
Zed, Mestika. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Larasati Fitriani Asis, Rommy Hardyansah, Adi Herisasono, Yeni Vitrianingsih, Mujito, Sarwo Waskito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
