Telaah Terhadap Banyaknya Permohonan Praperadilan Yang Gagal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i01.185Keywords:
permohonan, praperadilan, Application,, PretrialAbstract
Abstract
The Pretrial Institution is the authority possessed by the District Court to examine and decide whether or not the arrest and/or detention of a suspect is legal, terminate the investigation or prosecution, as well as request for compensation or rehabilitation by the suspect. This research uses a type of library research, namely research related to reading, recording and managing materials used in activities related to research. The data collection technique uses library research. The results of the study show that many pretrial application practices fail due to failure to fulfill formal and material requirements as well as inconsistencies between the arguments submitted and a lack of sufficient evidence to justify the pretrial application.
Keywords: Application, Pretrial
Abstrak
Lembaga Praperadilan adalah kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh Pengadilan Negeri untuk memeriksa dan memutus sah atau tidaknya penangkapan dan atau penahanan tersangka, penghentian penyidikan atau penuntutan, serta permohonan ganti rugi atau rehabilitasi oleh tersangka. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kepustakaan (library research), yakni penelitian yang berkenaan dengan membaca, mencatat dan mengelola bahan-bahan yang digunakan dalam kegiatan yang berkaitan dengan penelitian. Teknik pengumpulan datanya menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa banyaknya praktik permohonan praperadilan yang gagal dikarenakan tidak memenuhi syarat formil dan materiil serta ketidaksesuaian antara argumen yang diajukan serta kurangnya bukti yang cukup untuk membenarkan permohonan praperadilan tersebut.
Kata Kunci: Permohonan, Praperadilan
References
Barda Nawawi Arief, S H. 2018. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Prenada Media.
Nurul Alfiah, Ratna. 1986. Praperadilan dan Ruang Lingkupnya. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Pangaribuan, Luhut M P. 2013. Hukum Acara Pidana: Surat Resmi Advokat Di Pengadilan Praperadilan, Eksepsi, Pledoi, Duplik, Memori Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali. Penerbit Papas Sinar Sinanti.
Purba, Tumian Lian Daya. 2018. “Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Hukum Bagi Tersangka.” Papua Law Journal 1 (2): 253–70. https://doi.org/10.31957/plj.v1i2.591.
Rubaie, Ach. 2017. Putusan Uktra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Filosofis, Teoritis dan Yuridis. Surabaya: Laksbang Pressindo.
Yahya Harahap, M. 2000. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan). Jakarta: Sinar Gratika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zuman Malaka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
