Organisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Peradilan di Indonesia

Authors

  • Zuman Malaka Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Taruna Surabaya
  • Abdullah Isa Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Taruna Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v1i01.63

Keywords:

Judiciary, Principles, Organizational Structure, state administration

Abstract

The judiciary is the executor of judicial power in charge of administering the judiciary in order to enforce law and justice based on Pancasila, with other tasks assigned to it based on the applicable law. In the framework of the rule of law, the existence of a state administrative court is essentially a logical consequence of the principle of government based on law (wetmatigheid van het bestuur). For the Indonesian people, the existence of this state administrative court is a court that is considered young, and contains provisions and procedural concepts that are universal. In state administrative law courts, of course, the principles of state administrative court procedures are needed which include the principle of activity, the principle of not knowing conversion, the principle of not knowing peace, the principle of presumtea iustaecausa, the principle of protection of the public interest.

References

ASTALOG.COM, Apa Yang Dimaksud Dengan Lembaga Pengadilan dan Peradilan? http://www.astalog.com/2142/apa-yang-dimaksud-dengan-lembaga-pengadilan-dan-peradilan.htm, diakses pada tanggal 19 Juli 2017, pukul 20.44 WIB.

Bisri, Cik Hasan. Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1996.

John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (revised edn, Oxford: OUP, 1999.

Harahap, Zairin. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor : KMA/012/SK/III/1993 Tentang Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Dan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara (PT.TUN),” March 5, 1993.

———. “Pedoman Teknis Administrasi Dan Teknis Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,” June 2007.

———. “Surat Sekretaris Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor : 907 /SEK/KP.01.2/6/2020 Tentang Penetapan Nomenklatur Jabatan Pelaksana,” n.d.

Marbun, S. F. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.

Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo. Perkembangan Peradilan Islam Dari Kahin Di Jazirah Arab Ke Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2011.

Mustafa, Bachsan. Sistem Hukum Indonesia Terpadu. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.

Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Nomor: 5 Tahun 1986 Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor: 9 Tahun 2004 Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor: 51 Tahun 2009,” n.d.

Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Perwakilan Republik Indonesia. “Proses Pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,” 1986.

Tjandra, W. Riawan. Teori Dan Praktek Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, 2010.

Thomas Nagel, The Problem of Global Justice, Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2005).

Waldron, Jeremy. “Separation of Power In Thought and Practice?” Boston College Law Review 54, no. 433 (2013).

Downloads

Published

2023-01-27

How to Cite

Malaka, Z., & Isa, A. (2023). Organisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Peradilan di Indonesia. TARUNALAW : Journal of Law and Syariah, 1(01), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v1i01.63